Posts Tagged ‘workplace injuries’

I2P2 Top Priority on OSHA’s Fall Regulatory Agenda

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

OSHA bannerAmong the other regulatory updates in OSHA’s semi-annual agenda that was released on December 20th in the Federal Register, the Injury and Illness Prevention Program (I2P2) was said to be at the top of OSHA Administrator Dr. David Michael’s priority list. We have been hearing a lot about I2P2 lately, but if you are unfamiliar with the program, it would require employers to find and fix hazards, and plan, implement, evaluate, and improve workplace processes and activities in the interest of protecting workers’ safety and health.

“OSHA believes that an injury and illness prevention program is a universal intervention that can be used in a wide spectrum of workplaces to dramatically reduce the number and severity of workplace injuries,” the agenda states. “Such programs have been shown to be effective in many workplaces in the United States and internationally.”

Other updates on regulatory actions including modernizing recording and reporting requirements, infectious diseases, OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), proposed combustible dust rule, proposal for an MSD Column on the OSHA 300 log, and the proposed Walking Working Surfaces and Personal Fall Protection Systems (Slips, Trips, and Fall Prevention) rule. Find out more information at http://www.dol.gov/regulations.

Read more about how a KPA safety program help you meet compliance with the I2P2 standard.

National Emphasis Program on Recordkeeping (NEP) targets manufacturing, larger worksites, and facilities with high injury rates

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

On September 28, 2010, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a revised directive to its federal pilot National Emphasis Program (NEP). The instruction to NEP to inspect the accuracy of the Occupational Injury and Illness recording and reporting requirements for establishments in selected industries such as manufacturing, larger worksites, and employers with higher injury rates than in the initial criteria, and to ensure appropriate enforcement of these requirements if employers are found to be underrecording injuries and illnesses.

OSHA launched its “National Emphasis Program on Recordkeeping” last year after various academic studies revealed that many companies were underreporting or incorrectly reporting workplace-related injuries and illnesses. Through the NEP, OSHA plans to enforce this type of inaccurate reporting.

The significant NEP changes include:

  • Broadening the industry targeting, with an emphasis on manufacturing.
  • Removing the deletion criterion for establishments that have recalculated days away, restriction, and transfer (DART) rates greater than 4.2. The new DART rate criterion for establishments under the program is greater than 4.2 and less than 8.
  • Increasing comprehensive training of its compliance staff to identify and correct violations of the recordkeeping regulation.
  • on company records from the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.
  • Focusing on company records from the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.

The NEP pilot program will continue through February 2012.

Read more here about this directive.

Acetone – More than Nail Polish Remover

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

Acetone has a low toxicity and is a good solvent, making it as useful for removing nail polish as it is for degreasing and paint cleanup on the shop floor, but it also highly flammable. The acetone vapor (remember that vapor causes burns – not liquid) is heavier than air, can travel a considerable distance and can also accumulate in a confined space. Unfortunately, two workers cleaning a paint booth were not aware of the proper precautions to take when dealing with this highly flammable liquid, and were severely injured. The two Evansville, Tennessee companies involved in this incident are to be fined more than $100,000 by Indiana’s OSHA due to their negligence. The Agency alleges that two workers were mopping a large paint booth with acetone when one of the workers accidentally knocked over a halogen light. As it hit the floor, it ignited the acetone fumes into a flash fire. A flash fire is an unexpected, instant, intense fire that is instigated by the reaction.

The Evansville Courier & Press reports that Guardian Automotive is being fined $22,500 for a set of penalties the state categorized as serious. Team Industrial Services Inc., the agency that supplied the workers and instructed them to use the lamp and the cleaner, faces a steeper $84,150 fine. Of that amount, $63,000 is for a violation which state inspectors categorized as “knowing” — the most serious classification, and one used only several times per year, said Jeff Carter, the deputy state OSHA commissioner. “Knowing” violations are those violations where death or serious physical harm can result from a hazard an employer knew or should have known exists.

When dealing with flammable substance, you simply cannot be too careful. Take a few minutes to review the following tips:

1)   Know your chemicals, read all labels, and consult the MSDS (material safety data sheet)

2)   Remember that vapor burns, not liquid, so always work with adequate ventilation and avoid confined spaces

3)   Eliminate potential ignition sources, any heat source is potential ignition source

4)   Bond and ground when transferring flammable liquids, it only takes one spark

5)   Practice good housekeeping by segregating flammable substances and keeping them covered in closed containers

6)   Always use appropriate equipment to apply, transfer and store flammable liquids

Additional Resources

  1. OHSA www.osha.gov
  2. EPA www.epa.gov
  3. National Fire Protection Association www.nfpa.com
  4. International Code Council www.iccsafe.org

OSHA Severe Violator Enforcement Program Now in Effect!

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

“The New OSHA” as described by many department heads is showing its colors and making good on its promises.  The recently enacted Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP) is  now in effect and being enforced.  What exactly does this mean to you?

In the words of David Michaels, OSHA administrator, “SVEP will help OSHA concentrate its efforts on those repeatedly recalcitrant employers who fail to meet their obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. It will include a more intense examination of an employer’s practices for systemic problems that would trigger additional mandatory inspections.”

In reality it means more inspections, bigger fines and larger inspection scope.  Basically if you’re not making real efforts to keep your employees safe, it’ll cost you.  Under this program OSHA has promised to visit more employers with higher incidence rates, automatically include employers for follow up inspections, visit other locations run under the same corporate umbrella and raise fines for the first time since the 1990s.  The fine increase is significant from a max penalty for a  willful violation from $70,000 to $250,000.

We’ll see how all of this pans out for our clients, although with what we’ve personally seen in the past few months in much of the country, this program certainly seems to be on track.  Have any of you seen an increase in regulatory pressure?

OSHA considering I2P2 – Injury and Illness prevention Program

Friday, June 4th, 2010

OSHA is conducting stakeholder meetings to draft a proposed rule around a federal Injury and Illness prevention Program.  Based on recent comments by OSHA chief Dr. David Michaels the department is looking to encourage businesses to proactively identify and correct hazards.  OSHA will be conducting a series of stake holder meetings in June to solicit input on a draft rule.  They have published some information at http://www.dol.gov/federalregister/HtmlDisplay.aspx?DocId=23834&AgencyId=17.

This is not the first time that OSHA has gone down this path, the most recent attempt to create a Federal Injury and Illness Prevention Standard was tabled in August of 2002.  However with the current administration it appears more likely that the standard will move forward this time.

How it will affect KPA clients remains to be seen, but with KPA’s current program modeled after the California IIPP rules; it is likely that a current KPA client will exceed compliance with few program adjustments. California has required business with more than 10 employees to have an Injury and Illness Prevention Program since 1991.

OSHA cites auto parts maker fot $135,900

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

OSHA has cited auto parts maker Sewon America Inc. in LaGrange, Ga., for a variety of safety violations after receiving a complaint. OSHA initiated a comprehensive inspection of the company’s facility in March. Penalties total $135,900.

Read more detail in an article posted in OH&S Magazine.

OSHA in the news

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

I just posted this blog yesterday about OSHA and then –coincidentally– ABC World News with  Diane Sawyer and Nightline broadcasted an interview last night with OSHA director Dr. David Michaels, saying “I think there are a lot of irresponsible employers who don’t ensure that workers are given safe work places in which to work. Fourteen deaths a day on the job is far too many.” They also aired a dramatic video of a fatal accident on the job. Very shocking and disturbing.

My takeaway for you: many department managers forget to realize they have an obligation to provide a safe workplace, and as such, they can be held personally liable for criminal penalties should an injury occur particularly those associated with the supervisor’s willful intent to not address a known safety issue.

Top Three Myths about Workplace Injuries

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

I just read this great article “Top Three Myths about Workplace Injuries” in EHS Today. A summary of the Myths:

Myth #3 – You cannot create a hazard-free workplace – It requires discipline and diligence to recognize and mitigate every hazard.

Myth #2 – Being safe takes too much time and money – If you feel that being safe takes too much time and money, you have an attitude problem.

Myth #1 – Accidents just happen – Research shows that over 99 percent of all accidents are preventable.

I completely agree that these are major myths. Wayne Curtis wrote an article in our latest newsletter about two shining examples of Group 1 Automotive and Penske Automotive Group how these issues can be managed. Though both groups consist of nearly 100 dealer rooftops, these Groups have effectively managed their compliance scores of environmental and safety issues to an unbelievable 97 – 98% and have held this level of compliance consistently. To put this in perspective, we target approximately 85% to be the average compliance score for a new facility prior to getting started with KPA. Both Group 1 and Penske Automotive Group are not only reaching high level of compliance across one store, they are doing it for all stores, across all States. Essentially, Group 1 and Penske have managed their compliance program to virtually spot free facilities in less than one year. This once more shows that all it requires is discipline and diligence to recognize and mitigate every hazard.