Posts Tagged ‘Recordkeeping’

OSHA Proposes Changes to Recordkeeping Requirements for Dealerships

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

OSHA is currently requesting comments for a proposed regulation change to their recordkeeping requirements.  Currently, new and used car dealerships classified under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 5511 are considered a “low risk industry” and are partially exempt from OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements.  In this proposed regulation, in an effort to embrace a new industrial classification system introduced in 1997, OSHA is reclassifying new and used car dealerships as North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 4411 – Automobile Dealers.  This new classification and the associated injury and illness statistics place dealerships outside the “low risk industry” profile, disqualifying them from the partial exemption.  If this rule is accepted as is, dealers will be required to maintain additional accident information and post summaries of this data at the dealership every year.

Additional changes in this proposed regulation will require businesses to report work-related amputations to OSHA and all work-related fatalities and in-patient hospitalizations.  Currently reporting is only required for work-related fatalities and in-patient hospitalizations of three or more employees.

If you’d like to voice your opinion to OSHA on this proposed regulation  they would love your feedback on the following:

1. Should any additional industries be exempt from any of the recordkeeping requirements in Part 1904?

2. Should OSHA base partial exemptions on more detailed or more aggregated industry classifications, such as two-digit, three-digit, or six-digit NAICS codes?

3. Which industry sectors, if any, should be ineligible for partial exemption?

4. Instead of using an average DART rate of 75 percent of the most recent national DART rate, is there a better way to determine which industries should be included in Appendix A?

5. Should OSHA consider numbers of workers injured or made ill in each industry in addition to industry injury/illness rates in determining eligibility for partial exemption?

6. Are there any other data that should be applied as additional or alternative criteria for purposes of determining eligibility for partial exemption?

7. Should OSHA regularly update the list of lower-hazard exempted industries? If so, how frequently should the list be updated?

8. Are there any specific types of training, education, and compliance assistance OSHA could provide that would be particularly helpful in facilitating compliance with the recordkeeping requirements?

Comments may be submitted online at Regulations.gov

National Emphasis Program on Recordkeeping (NEP) targets manufacturing, larger worksites, and facilities with high injury rates

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

On September 28, 2010, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a revised directive to its federal pilot National Emphasis Program (NEP). The instruction to NEP to inspect the accuracy of the Occupational Injury and Illness recording and reporting requirements for establishments in selected industries such as manufacturing, larger worksites, and employers with higher injury rates than in the initial criteria, and to ensure appropriate enforcement of these requirements if employers are found to be underrecording injuries and illnesses.

OSHA launched its “National Emphasis Program on Recordkeeping” last year after various academic studies revealed that many companies were underreporting or incorrectly reporting workplace-related injuries and illnesses. Through the NEP, OSHA plans to enforce this type of inaccurate reporting.

The significant NEP changes include:

  • Broadening the industry targeting, with an emphasis on manufacturing.
  • Removing the deletion criterion for establishments that have recalculated days away, restriction, and transfer (DART) rates greater than 4.2. The new DART rate criterion for establishments under the program is greater than 4.2 and less than 8.
  • Increasing comprehensive training of its compliance staff to identify and correct violations of the recordkeeping regulation.
  • on company records from the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.
  • Focusing on company records from the 2008 and 2009 calendar years.

The NEP pilot program will continue through February 2012.

Read more here about this directive.

OSHA Administrator Announces Priorities: I2P2 and Electronic Reporting

Monday, June 21st, 2010

I just got back from ASSE 2010 where OSHA Administrator David Michaels Outlined some of the upcoming goals and priorities for OSHA. He made it clear that OSHA is looking to reinvent itself in some ways to become a stronger and more relevant agency with more personnel in enforcement, higher fines and a greater emphasis on prevention across all industries.

Looking to the future, he outlined top priorities OSHA is looking to address; with the top two being near and dear to KPA: Injury and Illness Prevention Programs (I2P2) and Electronic Recordkeeping.

We’ve been watching discussion of a federal Injury and Illness prevention standard grow and ebb over the past decade. It now looks like OSHA is making it their top priority. According to Michaels, this standard “could change workplace health and safety on a level we haven’t seen since OSH Act.” We couldn’t agree more. These regulations could have a tremendous effect on small business such as was felt when California passed their I2P2 standards. If done correctly, it can do a lot to shift the focus of safety from compliance to prevention. This is certainly one to watch as the discussions progress.

The number two priority, electronic recordkeeping, is another we’ve been following. With our online software solutions, we’re already tracking all of the information required for injury and illness records for our clients and would love to have a streamlined interface to report this information to OSHA at our client’s request. It will be interesting to see what OSHA comes up with for their data collection system. Again, depending on the implementation, the new regulation could have a big impact on small business and as a result OSHA is seeking more input from this sector. If you would like to have your opinion heard, you can submit it here.

This regulation is moving along quickly with OSHA’s prediction of a final rule by 2011.  We’ll keep you posted as more details emerge.

See our OSHA Safety Standards section for more information about the proposed OSHA I2P2 Standard.