Posts Tagged ‘OSHA’

Improper Lift Use Lands Georga Facility with $78,000 in Willful and Serious OSHA Violations

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

Take a look at the $78,000 OSHA citation just handed down to a Georgia facility of LKQ Corp. for vehicle lift modifications and related violations. We often find them in busy service bays and garages. As an employer, you must ensure that your employees have not added features or disabled safety devices.  It is important to follow manufacturer guidelines and the ANSI (American National Safety Institute) standard which requires regular lift inspections.

KPA uses the Automotive Lift Institutes resources to complete our lift training courses and you can access these same materials at http://www.autolift.org/.  This also brings up the interesting point that the company appears to have hired a contractor to inspect their hoists, but then failed to act on the recommendations.

Part of any good safety program is first having an hazard identification program and second correcting the hazards identified.

Changes at OSHA Mean Inspections on Rise, With New Hot Items

Friday, April 6th, 2012

It’s no secret that OSHA has aggressively pursued enforcement under President Obama’s Administration. With the closure of fiscal year 2011, OSHA published its semi-annual regulatory agenda, which shows the following trends regarding OSHA’s enforcement initiatives:

  1. The average proposed penalty for “serious” violations more than doubled in 2011.
  2. Regarding “significant” cases (such as investigations producing fines totaling at least $100,000), 215 cases were filed in 2011, which represents a 31% increase compared to 2010. Some “mega-penalty” citations have exceeded $1 million in 2011.
  3. In 2010, OSHA implemented new penalty guidelines that forced higher proposed penalties and allowed fewer reductions for employer size, good faith or history of violations.
  4. OSHA is more aggressively issuing “repeat” citations, which may carry a penalty of $70,000. The rules around this have changed, to the disadvantage of multiple-location businesses, and the time constraint qualifying repeat violations has increased from 3 to 5 years.

When it comes to enforcement, employers can expect to see a continued increase in OSHA activity for 2012. Despite the 100% increase in fine cost per violation, OSHA director Dr. David Michaels recently stated that the higher penalties are still too low when compared to other regulatory agencies.

KPA’s records show that the agency is following through on its intentions. We have seen a sharp increase in frequency of OSHA visits to clients in February, especially in New England states.

Changing Priorities at OSHA

In a January 12, 2012 interview with Bloomberg, OSHA director Dr. David Michaels said that the agency plans to issue rules in 2012 updating regulations concerning hazard communication, confined spaces, and recordkeeping (OSHA 300 Logs). For example the recordkeeping change may include a requirement for auto dealers to maintain OSHA 300 logs as well as vastly increase accident reporting requirements. While it is doubtful that all of these rules would pass into law, this activity indicates a shift in focus from previous hot issues. The agency is also setting sites on modifying Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) and on Jan. 6, 2012, OSHA sent a letter to the Small Business Administration (SBA), informing the SBA of its intention to convene a Small Business Advocacy Review panel for its I2P2 rule. Panels are convened for all rules expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of U.S. small businesses and are typically viewed as one of the first steps in the process of implementing a large rulemaking.

While OSHA’s overall budget remains about the same as last year, there are some significant shifting of funds within the agency. The FY 2013 proposed budget includes a 23.5% increase, including 37 new employees, for the agency’s 21 whistleblower protection programs. In other words, the current administration is encouraging workers to come forward with whistleblower complaints and the agency is targeting employers who retaliate against workers who file OSHA complaints. This reinforces the value of effective Safety Committees which promote communication of safety issues between employees and management.

Lower Priorities

In 2013, OSHA will no longer offer its Corporate and Merit Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) to new sites. The VPP star program will also decrease in services.

While OSHA continues to work on potential rulemaking on the musculoskeletal disorder recordkeeping (MDS), the proposed rule has been reclassified as a long-term action with no timetable for completing the rulemaking process. This means that the proposed separate 300 logs for musculoskeletal disorders may not be a requirement for a while, although back cases will continue to be recorded as either injuries or illnesses depending on the condition resulted from an event or exposure.

Summary

To sum it up, funds for whistleblower programs are going up, enforcement funding will stay the same, but there is a projected increase in inspection frequency. Some compliance assistance funding will be cut.

Dealerships and service centers should continue to review their ongoing assessments of workplace hazards and ensure that their employees are adequately trained on the numerous regulatory requirements enforced by OSHA. Compliance is still the best defense.

OSHA Announces Major Restructuring of Whistleblower Protection Program

Monday, March 12th, 2012

While OSHA’s 2012 funding remains relatively flat, the organization has proposed major budgetary shifts to the Office of the Whistleblower Protection Program (OWPP). This is part of a strategy to encourage more employees to report alleged workplace violations.

You can read the full press release at:

2012 – 03/01/2012 – US Department of Labor’s OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program moved to Office of the Assistant Secretary.

Don’t Miss Tomorrow’s Webinar- Ask the Expert: All Your Environment and Safety Questions Answered

Wednesday, February 15th, 2012

Don’t miss this practical guide to keeping your facility in compliance with laws and regulations. In this webinar you can ask nationally recognized Environment and Safety Expert, Eric Schmitz, your most pressing questions.  Find out what challenges other automotive professionals are facing so you can be prepared at your facility. Also, Eric will discuss some of the most recent fines from the EPA, OSHA, and DOT.

This event is part of KPA’s educational webinar series, and takes place at 12:00 EST.

Click here for more information and to sign-up for this free webinar.

 

OSHA Updates Multi-piece and Single-piece Rim Wheel Charts and Manuals

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

OSHA just announced that updated charts and manuals for servicing multi-piece and single-piece rim wheels are available, and that updated manuals will soon be distributed to the regulated community.

In updating this information, OSHA decided not to print large posters with the updated information, but to provide an 8.5 inch by 11 inch printed manuals containing this information that employers could use in the shop as an alternative to displaying the large posters. The manual would be more portable and accessible than a large poster, which employers typically mounted on a wall.

To reduce the distribution burden, OSHA will print and mail the manuals, but not the posters. The posters, as well as the manuals, will be available in electronic files (PDF) on the OSHA Web site at http://www.osha.gov/publications (and type “tire chart” in the search field).

OSHA also is revising the content of its two existing charts. The “Multi-piece Rim Matching Chart” will provide an updated list of multi-piece rim wheel components, both current and obsolete, while the “Demounting and Mounting Procedures for Truck/Bus Tires” chart will consist of two separate charts entitled “Demounting and Mounting Procedures for Tubeless Truck and Bus Tires” and “Demounting and Mounting Procedures for Tube-Type Truck and Bus Tires.”

Consistent with these revisions, OSHA is amending the definitions of “charts” in paragraph (b) of the standard to refer to the new Department of Labor charts (i.e., manuals or posters), or to any other information or poster that provides at least the same instructions, safety precautions, and other information contained in OSHA’s charts, and that is applicable to the types of rim wheels the employer is servicing.

OSHA Top 10 Violation: Electrical Safety Explained

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

The use of electricity has become so common that many people ignore or overlook the dangers it presents. Accidents caused by electricity are largely due to poor maintenance of electrical cords and equipment, improper use of electrical equipment, and unsafe working conditions. Three of the most common issues with electrical safety in a dealership are:
1. Access to Electrical Junction Boxes
2. Proper Breaker Box Labeling
3. Use of Extension Cords as Permanent Wiring

New Tire Charts from OSHA

Monday, December 5th, 2011

There has been a lot of buzz lately over tires. It seems like even touching them is regulated by some federal agency or another. Additionally, I’ve read a few lawsuits, where questions of dealership liability in accidents have been raised, and that doesn’t begin to touch the proliferation of information around waste tire generation, storage or hauling.

So I was not surprised to read that OSHA has revised materials addressing handling and storage standards for workers servicing single-piece and multi-piece rim wheels.

“These updated materials will provide readily accessible information on how to prevent worker injuries and deaths from tire-servicing incidents,” said Dr. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA. “The new format and easy access will simplify compliance with the standard by helping employers provide their workers with vital servicing information.”

The list of Revised Charts

Demounting and Mounting Procedures for Tube-type Truck and Bus Tires Chart

(OSHA 3402) (English: PDF)

Demounting and Mounting Procedures for Tubeless Truck and Bus Tires Chart
(OSHA 3401) (English: PDF)

Multi-Piece Rim Matching Chart
(OSHA 3403) (English: PDF)

Servicing Multi-Piece and Single-Piece Rim Wheels 29 CFR 1910.177 Manual

(OSHA 3421) (English: PDF)

 

You can also download all of these resources and other publications on OSHA’s Publications page.

Does the Respiratory Protection Standard Apply to You?

Friday, November 4th, 2011

Reading through the 124 pages of OSHA’s new publication, Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Respiratory Protection Standard, there are a few helpful things for dealerships and service centers. Here is one of them. Use this handy checklist to determine if you actually need a respiratory protection plan.

CHECKLIST FOR PERMISSIBLE PRACTICE

Hazard Determination
Is there a hazardous atmosphere in your workplace, which has (check all that apply):


 

If you did not check any of the boxes above, the Respiratory Protection standard does not apply to your workplace. If you checked any of the boxes above, the Respiratory Protection standard may apply to your workplace. OSHA requires use of the following methods to control the hazardous atmosphere(s) in your workplace:

If you did not check both of the boxes above, the Respiratory Protection standard does apply to your workplace, and you must develop a written respiratory protection program that is specific to your workplace.

How Do You Know if Your Safety Program Is Working?

Friday, October 7th, 2011

How do you measure success? You look for things that you can track and measure. These key indicators are pretty standard, and should be documented and communicated as part of your safety program:

•Workplace inspections (KPA audits and your myKPAonline.com account are excellent resources)
•Exposure assessments
•Injury, illness, and incident tracking
•Employee input
•OSHA assessment

A note about injury rates: They’re a little misleading because they are lagging indicators- they do a great job at showing performance under past circumstances and are not reliable for predicting future performance (but you still have to track injury rates for reporting to regulatory agencies- so don’t ignore them).

 

Get a clear picture of where your program is headed: Culture predicts outcomes.

•Track work practices and sustained behaviors that increase or reduce hazards
•The level that culture supports safety objectives and activities
For example, how fast are issues addressed in your myKPAonline account?
•Workers’ interest in safety activities and behaviors
•The value placed on workplace safety by senior leadership compared to other objectives

Yes, OSHA Can Cite Your Dealership for Workplace Violence.

Thursday, September 15th, 2011

This month, OSHA issued a new instruction for enforcement procedures for investigating or inspecting workplace violence incidents. It is effective in all Federal OSHA jurisdictions (State agencies are strongly encouraged to adopt this instruction), and tells field offices how to conduct inspections in response to workplace violence. While background studies for this enforcement have been ongoing since 1996, this is the first time that OSHA has issued an instruction that clarifies and explains the Agency’s policies and procedures around holding employers accountable for preventing workplace violence.

Here are the basics of what you need to know about the instruction:

  • This directive does not require an OSHA response to every complaint or fatality of workplace violence or require that citations or notices be issued for every incident inspected or investigated, but any of these events initiate an inspection if workplace violence is suspected as a hazard.
  • It provides general enforcement guidance to be applied in determining whether to make an initial response and/or
    cite an employer.
  • An instance of workplace violence is presumed to be work related if it results from an event occurring in the workplace.
  • Employers may be found in violation of the general duty clause if they fail to reduce or eliminate serious recognized hazards.
  • Classifies four types of workplace violence
  • Identifies high-risk factors for workplaces, including contact with the  general public, handling money and valuables, delivering passengers goods or services, or located in areas with high crime rates.

 

Changes in inspections

  • Inspectors should gather evidence to demonstrate whether an employer recognized, either individually or through its industry, the existence of a potential workplace violence hazard affecting his or her employees.
  • Investigations should focus on the availability to employers of feasible means of preventing or minimizing workplace violence hazards.

 

What it means for employers

  • In workplaces where a potential for violence against employees has been identified, the employer should develop and implement a workplace violence prevention program.
  • Keep documentation of “feasible means of abatement” on hand, including any precautions or protective measures taken by the employer to prevent or minimize workplace violence. Include a security plan, training plan, presence of a preventive plan, or other safety documents.
  • Maintain five years of injury illness records on site, including workers’ compensation records, insurance records, police reports, security reports, first-aid logs, employee emergency action plans, OSHA 300 logs, union complaints (if applicable),  past complaints or grievances noting a particular hazard, meeting minutes where workplace violence issues are discussed, and accident or near miss logs.

 

Further reading:

Enforcement Procedures for Investigating or Inspecting Workplace Violence (PDF download)

OSHA’s new Workplace Violence page

OSHA Safety and Health Topics Workplace Violence