Posts Tagged ‘HR best practice’

Effective Open Enrollment Communications

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

For the average HR professional the fall season means open enrollment for benefit plans.  Many benefit plans have major changes due to healthcare reform so it is more important then ever the employers provide effective communitions to their employees during open enrollment.  Frank Lutz, an expert on communications and polling offered the following insights during his keynote address at the 23rd Annual Benefit Forum and Expo on September 26, 2010 as reported by SHRM (Society for Human Resources Management).

Luntz recommended simplicity, brevity, credibility and consistency with a focus on visual images. “Employees don’t want to read long texts, and won’t… when you include a graphic on the page, employees are 60 percent more likely to read that page”.  Pictures of employees receiving services from a doctor or other health care practitioner are particularly effective images.

A recent poll showed that 51% of employees prefer to receive health care information through e-mail or online, and only 26% prefer receiving an easy-to-read handout or booklet. “Five years ago, receiving the booklet was the No. 1 response,” Luntz said.  Lutz also recommends a Q&A style format.  ”Ask the questions that employees are most likely to ask, the way they are likely to ask them.”

For more great information on benefits and benefit communication be sure to check out this website, http://ebn.benefitnews.com/.

Handbooks – Make Them Matter

Friday, October 1st, 2010

With the best of intentions, employers create a company handbook, distribute it to all employees, and then are puzzled when the policies are not followed. To make your company handbooks matter, make sure it is EATEN – easily understood, acknowledged, trained, enforced, needed.

Easily understood. Be sure that the employee handbook is written in clear and simple language; no “legalese” please.

Acknowledged. Employee’s signature should indicate that they understand and agree to the handbook and have acknowledged the information they have reviewed.

Trained. Employees are trained on key policies to ensure understanding and create a “good faith” defense.

Enforced. All of the policies are enforced for everyone – “no exceptions” or “exceptions” become the rule.

Needed. Include the needed information only. Too much information and employees are overwhelmed, so only include the information which you plan to enforce.

Live Long and Prosper- Corporate Wellness Programs

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Is it possible to have healthy employees and a healthily bottom line?  With ever increasing healthcare insurance costs, reported obesity rate of 1 in 3 adults, and a rapidly aging workforce it would certainly seem that improving the health of employees would be good for the employees and good for the company. In fact the Healthy People 2010 program managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services set a goal of:

  • 75% of all employers, regardless of size, providing wide reaching corporate wellness programs
  • 75% of all a company’s staff participating in employer-sponsored corporate wellness programs.

When implementing a corporate program you do need to be careful in how the program is designed and employee participation handled.  Otherwise it can become yet another area for claims of employment discrimination and the violation of employee privacy.    Corporate wellness programs can easily run afoul of the law despite of the best of intentions because multiple federal laws come into play.  The Congressional Research Service recently issued a report on where these programs and federal law intersect. The report discusses the challenges employees face in implementation a program while not discriminating against employees and complying with HIPAA requirements.  The report is available at http://www.disabilityleavelaw.com/uploads/file/CRS%20Wellness%20Report(1).pdf

Two resources on best practices for corporate wellness programs are Infinite Wellness Solution’s Wellness Solutions Guide and the HRM Report on Corporate Wellness.

Join the conversation: do you have a corporate wellness program or plan to implement one in 2011?

Exempt or Non-Exempt, Don’t Teeter-Totter On the Edge of Compliance

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

Exempt or non-exempt, or maybe independent contractor- proper classification of employees has many employers teetering on the edge of compliance. With wage and hour law violations already one of the most common causes of employment litigation and regulatory audits the U.S Department of Labor, along with multiple states, has announced new legislation and enforcement guidelines.  It is more important than ever that employers ensure that all employees are correctly classified and paid accurately according to the classification.

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the U.S. Department of Labor has proposed  regulations that require employers notify workers of their FLSA rights, and to provide them with information regarding hours worked and methods of wage computation. In addition to the proposed WHD regulations Congress is considering The Fair Playing Field Act of 2010 and The Employee Misclassification Prevention Act of 2010. These acts are expected to pass in 2010 or early 2011.

Beyond the federal regulations, New York, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho and Illinois require that all new hires be provided with written notice of: their pay rate(s); their overtime pay rate (if they qualify for overtime pay); and their regular payday. New York also requires that every employer that has employees classified as exempt must “ perform a classification analysis, disclose that analysis to the worker, and retain that analysis to give to the WHD enforcement personnel who might request it.”

For additional information on the Fair Labor Standards Act, employee classification and wage payment download the free webinars “Essential of Wage and Hour Law”, Advanced Wage and Hour Law” or “California Wage and Hour Law for Dealerships at www.kpaonline.com/news-and-events/webinars/recorded-webinars.html.   HotlinkHR clients may contact the HR Advice Line for additional assistance in employee classification.

Speed Reading Resumes

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Apparently HR managers are quite the speed readers.  A recent survey by Career Builder indicates that 48 percent of HR managers surveyed say they typically review up to 25 applications for open positions. Thirty-eight percent of HR managers said they spend less than a minute reviewing a resume, and 18 percent said they spend less than 30 seconds. Given how important making the right hire is- the cost of a bad hire is estimated between 1.5 and 3 times the annual salary- and the fact the average cost to hire an employee is $4000 -maybe we all need to slow down and read resumes and applications just a bit more carefully at the beginning.

To learn more about best practice in hiring, the right and wrong questions to ask in an interview, and how to make sure you hire the right person for the right job, check out KPA’s free webinar series.

Get Sued- The 5 Most Common Mistakes Employers Make

Saturday, September 18th, 2010

Do you want to be sued?  What a silly question, what employer wants to be sued or audited- yet too often employers become involved in employment litigation simply because they failed to follow the most basic HR practices.  In conversations with both plaintiff and defendant employment attorneys and discussions with KPA’s partner attorneys, I have found the following 5 mistakes seem to be the most common reasons for employment litigation.

1) Asking unlawful questions during the interview

2) Responding inappropriately to requests for leave (ADA, FMLA, Work Comp)

3)  Not maintaining up to date policies and handbooks and ensuring all employees are aware of and understand the policies.

4) Poor practices in disciplining employees- inconsistent disciplinary practices, inadequate documentation and incomplete follow up.

5)  Unsound termination decisions-employers have the right to terminate employees but not based on discriminatory criteria.

If you are concerned that your HR practices are not quite up to par in any of these areas join KPA on September 23, 2010 for a free webinar “Your Legal Questions Answered”. In this webinar you will have the opportunity to ask national recognized employment attorney, Jim Hendricks, your most pressing HR questions. Hear what HR legal challenges other dealers are facing. You will learn the answers to these questions and more…

  • Do salaried employees get overtime pay?
  • Can I fire someone when I have never given them a disciplinary warning?
  • Do all employees need a job description?
  • Should employees be able to see the contents of their personnel file?
  • What is reasonable suspicion for a substance abuse test?

You may submit questions in advance using the form on the registration page. You can also ask questions during the webinar. We will not disclose any confidential information, including your name or company information during the Q&A.

Register Today!

No more carrots or sticks- new ways to motivate employees

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Employee engagment and employee motivation are areas where HR can have real impact on the bottom line of a business.  However the traditional peformance motivators of money (the carrot) or termination (the stick) may not be effective at driving the behaviors that employers need from employees to thrive in the new economy according to the best selling author Dan Pink.

Instead Dan believes that “the  secret to high performance and satisfaction—at work, at school, and at home—is the deeply human need to direct our own lives, to learn and create new things, and to do better by ourselves and our world…the three elements of true motivation are—autonomy, mastery, and purpose“.  Dan offers a compelling case for a new way to motive in his book Drive: The Surprising Science of What  Motivates Us.  Dan provides 50 years of behavioral science to overturn the conventional wisdom about human motivation and offer a more effective path to high performance.   Even if you don’t have time to read the book take 20 minutes to see Dan present an overview of the new science of motivation at the TED:Ideas Worth Spreading website

Join the conversation: What is the best approach to motivation?

Imbibing Idiots and Job Interviews

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

 Most managers and HR professional think they are good at objective interviewing- when in fact they are influenced by all sorts of subconscious bias.  A recent study (with the wonderful title of “The Imbibing Idiot”) highlights this by reporting that applicants who order an alcoholic beverage when taken to dinner or lunch during the interviewing process are perceived as less intelligent- even by those interviewers who ordered an alcoholic beverage themselves.  The study authors, Scott Rick of the University of Michigan and Maurice E. Schweitzer of the University of Pennsylvania, also reported the job candidates fail to anticipate that ordering an alcoholic beverage will reduce their perceived intelligence. 

What can we learn from this as interviewers? Recognize that we all bring some degree of bias to an interview.  Use scorecards, assessment testing, and third party reviews to make the selection process as objective as possible.  As applicants and employees we should consider how we want to be perceived before we order that glass of wine- even if the interviewer or boss just ordered one for themselves. Don’t forget your social media sites- no pictures of alcoholic beverages allowed for general viewing.

Join the conversation:  Should you order an alcoholic beverage during interview? What if the interviewer is ordering one? Wouldn’t the Imbibing Idiots be a great name for a band?

Close & Personal Relationships At Work- Not A Good Idea

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Falling under the category of “what where they thinking” or perhaps “when in doubt don’t”  the Chairman and CEO Of HP resigned today after an investigation into  violations of  the company’s sexual harrassment policy.  The investigation found that while no harrassment had occurred, expense reports had been altered to cover up his “close and personal relationship” with a marketing consulting hired by his office.  Given that Mr. Hurd received nearly $100 million in total compensation over the past three years he certainly could have afforded to pay out of pocket the estimated $20,000 of ”altered expenses”.

Kudo on insisiting on ethical behavior and Mr. Hurd resignation go to the HP board- since Mr. Hurd is acknowledged as the architect of HP successful turn-around and by all accounts a good CEO, despite this recent lapse in judgement, it might have been easier to keep him on and sweep this under the rug.  It will be interesting to see how much of his contracted $12M severance payment he actually receives and will HP also insist on criminal charges.

A series of bad decisions around a personal relationship in the workplace has now lead to the resignation of a highly successful leader, a leadership vacuum at HP,  a decreased stock prices that impact any one who owns the stock, to say nothing of the embarrassment to his wife and family.

Approach with caution- using the internet for recruiting

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Since 75% of HR professionals admit to Googling, Twittering and Facebooking in their quest to find out the dirt on a candidate let’s consider what that really means.

  • Who did you really find? There are several Kathryn Carlsons out there working in HR, you  are going to have to dig a bit to make sure you really have found me.  All the other Kathryns seem very nice by the way but they aren’t me. Plus what you do find on me is nothing I wouldn’t have told you if you asked because I monitor my online profile very, very carefully and I never accept an inviation  to any site unless I know I can count on the person to provide truthful information about me.  Facebook- nothing there I’m ashamed of and you will have to hack in anyway because I only share my Facebook page with family and very good friends.   Want some  insight on who I am- the OPUS assessment I took before being hired at KPA provided more information that then any web search.  A web search only confirms that I have worked in various area of HR for a number of years, published a bit, write a blog on HR issues, and been quoted in some articles.
  • Did your candidate really post that information? I did a Google search yesterday and lo and behold there was a new link with my name – it was me, it was from a article that used some information I had published and it was all good, but I didn’t put it out there.  If it hadn’t been good or truthful I would have taken steps to remove it.
  • Texts, pictures, and videos may have been manipulated before posting or after posting. Not convinced? Call the Department of Agriculture and let them explain how they fired Shirley Sherrod because of a doctored clip and then they had to apologize and offer her a new job  and the President appologized personally and the NAACP apologized and on and on…just because nobody took 10 minutes to research if this was the full text of a speech or a clip used by a blogger for his own purposes.

By the way those Internet searches you are doing in your effort to be a good recruiter/hiring manager? They are bound to reveal information you wish you didn’t have and go to great pains to not collect on an employment application or during the interview…  if you really want to know information about race, religion, disability, sexual preference and where they take vacations and what their pet’s name is…go for it… and then explain why that information never factored in the hiring decision when you are sued for discrimination.

Bottom line- If you use the internet to research information consider it part of the background check and do it after you get a release from the applicant.  Publish a social media policy so employees understand the ground rules and know that you will be checking up.  Stop and think before you use any information you find.

Join the conversation:  Have you Googled yourself lately?