<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KPA&#187; EEOC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kpaonline.com/tag/eeoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com</link>
	<description>EHS &#38; HR Compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 EEO-1 Report Due 9/30/11</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/09/eeo-1-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/09/eeo-1-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamara Lischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographic Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing Deadline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deadline to file the 2011 EEO-1 Report is fast approaching.  Are you required to file? All private employers with 100 or more employees or employers who have less than 100 employees, but are affiliated with another company and has centralized ownership, control or management are required to file the EEO-1 Report with the Equal Employment Opportunity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/09/eeo-1-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC Issues Final Regulations for ADA Compliance</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/eeoc-ada-regulations-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/eeoc-ada-regulations-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans With Disablities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you define what is a disability and who is covered under the ADA (Americans With Disabilities Act) and ADAAA (ADA Amendments Act of 2008) ?  The answer to this question of what is a disability  under the EEOC final regulations may surprise you.  Watch this short video to learn about the impact on employers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/eeoc-ada-regulations-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Lawsuits Does It Take&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/employment-lawsuit-autozone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/employment-lawsuit-autozone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile work enviroment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While &#8220;How many lawsuits does it take&#8221; does sounds like the beginning of an HR joke, AutoZone isn&#8217;t laughing.  The company has faced multiple employment lawsuits over the past several years and lost all of them, resulting in some very costly verdicts.  Most recently, on March 28th 2011,  the Ninth Circuit upheld a verdict for the EEOC  against AutoZone with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2011/04/employment-lawsuit-autozone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEO-1 Reports Are Due September 30th</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/08/eeo-1-reports-are-due-september-30th/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/08/eeo-1-reports-are-due-september-30th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eeo 1 report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those employers required to complete an annual EEO-1 report the deadline is fast approaching and September 30th will be here before you know it. Any employer with 100 or more employees or those employers who are federal contractors or subcontractors must file the report. Gathering the required information can take some time if you are not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/08/eeo-1-reports-are-due-september-30th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Approach with caution- using the internet for recruiting</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/approach-with-caution-using-the-internet-in-recruiting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/approach-with-caution-using-the-internet-in-recruiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hr professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 75% of HR professionals admit to Googling, Twittering and Facebooking in their quest to find out the dirt on a candidate let&#8217;s consider what that really means. Who did you really find? There are several Kathryn Carlsons out there working in HR, you  are going to have to dig a bit to make sure you really have found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/approach-with-caution-using-the-internet-in-recruiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday ADA (Americans With Disablities Act)</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/happy-birthday-ada-americans-with-disablities-act/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/happy-birthday-ada-americans-with-disablities-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans With Disablities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy 20th  Birthday to the ADA (Americans with Disability Act)! Since becoming the law on July 26, 1990 the ADA has protected the rights of the disabled including access to public places, enforcing non-discrimination and requiring &#8220;reasonable accomodation&#8221; in the workplace.  Further protections for the disabled were provided by the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/07/happy-birthday-ada-americans-with-disablities-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the cost of not allowing women mechanics at your dealership? $55K based on latest EEOC settlement</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/06/what-is-the-cost-of-not-having-a-women-mechanic-at-your-dealership-55k-based-on-latest-eeoc-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/06/what-is-the-cost-of-not-having-a-women-mechanic-at-your-dealership-55k-based-on-latest-eeoc-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal employment opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorcycle dealership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there any reason why women should not work as motorcycle mechanics? The obvious answer of course not-and the Dudley Perkins Company probably wishes that had been their reasoning in the past after paying out $55,000 to settle a lawsuit accusing them of not allow a women to work as a mechanic. The The Dudley Perkins Company, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/06/what-is-the-cost-of-not-having-a-women-mechanic-at-your-dealership-55k-based-on-latest-eeoc-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Platinum Rule for Workforce Management and Human Resources</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/04/the-platinum-rule-for-workforce-management-and-human-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/04/the-platinum-rule-for-workforce-management-and-human-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I look the list of recent EEOC settlements for both small businesses and large international companies, law firms (they really should have known better) to manufacturing companies, I am struck by one simple fact.  ALL of these lawsuits and settlements could have been avoided if managers, supervisors and executives followed one simple rule, aka the platinum rule, first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/04/the-platinum-rule-for-workforce-management-and-human-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another discrimination settlement with a dealership, but this time for disability discrimination.</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/yet-another-discrimination-settlement-with-a-dealership-but-this-time-for-disability-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/yet-another-discrimination-settlement-with-a-dealership-but-this-time-for-disability-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance tip of the month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of lawsuits involving dealerships and the EEOC continue to rise.  Learn five steps to help you prevent claims of disability discrimination.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/yet-another-discrimination-settlement-with-a-dealership-but-this-time-for-disability-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Background Screening Really Reduce Risk?</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/does-background-screening-really-reduce-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/does-background-screening-really-reduce-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reduce risk using background screening but be aware of EEOC regulations to ensure your  screening and hiring processdoes not discriminate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/03/does-background-screening-really-reduce-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sitting ducks- why do business not follow basic HR regulations?</title>
		<link>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/01/sitting-ducks-why-do-business-not-follow-basic-hr-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/01/sitting-ducks-why-do-business-not-follow-basic-hr-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR: Industry Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage and Hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kpaonline.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week the EEOC entered into a $1.5M settlement with a Colorado auto dealer, and then on Monday announced another $85,000 settlement with a dealership in Ohio. In both cases basic HR best practices and federal and state regulations were not followed. The question is why?  Is it a lack of understanding of the regulations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kpaonline.com/2010/01/sitting-ducks-why-do-business-not-follow-basic-hr-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/19 queries in 0.053 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c867995.r95.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: blog.kpaonline.com @ 2012-02-04 23:32:55 -->
